Social Networking Addiction among Health Sciences Students in Oman

Ken Masters

Abstract


Objectives: Addiction to social networking sites (SNSs) is an international issue with numerous methods of measurement. The impact of such addictions among health science students is of particular concern. This study aimed to measure SNS addiction rates among health sciences students at Sultan Qaboos University (SQU) in Muscat, Oman. Methods: In April 2014, an anonymous English-language six-item electronic self-reporting survey based on the Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale was administered to a non-random cohort of 141 medical and laboratory science students at SQU. The survey was used to measure usage of three SNSs: Facebook (Facebook Inc., Menlo Park, California, USA), YouTube (YouTube, San Bruno, California, USA) and Twitter (Twitter Inc., San Francisco, California, USA). Two sets of criteria were used to calculate addiction rates (a score of 3 on at least four survey items or a score of 3 on all six items). Work-related SNS usage was also measured. Results: A total of 81 students completed the survey (response rate: 57.4%). Of the three SNSs, YouTube was most commonly used (100%), followed by Facebook (91.4%) and Twitter (70.4%). Usage and addiction rates varied significantly across the three SNSs. Addiction rates to Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, respectively, varied according to the criteria used (14.2%, 47.2% and 33.3% versus 6.3%, 13.8% and 12.8%). However, addiction rates decreased when workrelated activity was taken into account. Conclusion: Rates of SNS addiction among this cohort indicate a need for intervention. Additionally, the results suggest that addiction to individual SNSs should be measured and that workrelated activities should be taken into account during measurement.

Keywords: Addictive Behaviors; Internet; Social Networking; Social Media; Students; Oman.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Internet World Stats. Internet users of the world: Distribution by world regions - 2014 Q4. From: www.internetworldstats. com/stats.htm Accessed: Feb 2015.

eMarketer. Social networking reaches nearly one in four around the world. From: www.emarketer.com/Article/ Social-Networking-Reaches-Nearly-One-Four-AroundWorld/1009976 Accessed: Feb 2015.

Statistics Brain Research Institute. Facebook statistics. From: www.statisticbrain.com/facebook-statistics/ Accessed: Feb 2015.

YouTube. Statistics. From: www.youtube.com/yt/press/ statistics.html Accessed: Feb 2015.

Statistics Brain Research Institute. Twitter statistics. From: www.statisticbrain.com/twitter-statistics/ Accessed: Feb 2015.

Internet World Stats. Internet users in the Middle East and the world: 2014 Q4. From: www.internetworldstats.com/stats5. htm Accessed: Feb 2015.

Masters K, Ng’ambi D, Todd G. “I found it on the Internet”: Preparing for the e-patient in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2010; 10:169–79.

Boyd D. It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, Connecticut, USA: Yale University Press, 2014.

Young KS. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav 1998; 1:237–44. doi: 10.1089/ cpb.1998.1.237.

Beard KW. Internet addiction: A review of current assessment techniques and potential assessment questions. Cyberpsychol Behav 2005; 8:7–14. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.7.

Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD, Binder JF. Internet addiction in students: Prevalence and risk factors. Comput Human Behav 2013; 29:959–66. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.024.

Pezoa-Jares RE, Espinoza-Luna IL, Vasquez-Medina JA. Internet addiction: A review. J Addict Res Ther 2012; S6:004. doi: 10.4172/2155-6105.S6-004.

Yung K, Eickhoff E, Davis DL, Klam WP, Doan AP. Internet addiction disorder and problematic use of Google Glass™ in patient treated at a residential substance abuse treatment program. Addict Behav 2015; 41:58–60. doi: 10.1016/j. addbeh.2014.09.024.

Çam E, İşbulan O. A new addiction for teacher candidates: Social networks. Turk Online J Educ Tech 2012; 11:14–9.

Petry NM, Rehbein F, Gentile DA, Lemmens JS, Rumpf HJ, Mößle T, et al. An international consensus for assessing internet gaming disorder using the new DSM-5 approach. Addiction 2014; 109:1399–406. doi: 10.1111/add.12457.

Lemmens JS, Valkenburg PM, Peter J. Development and validation of a game addiction scale for adolescents. Media Psych 2009; 12:77–95. doi: 10.1080/15213260802669458.

Lee EB. Too much information: Heavy smartphone and Facebook utilization by African American young adults. J Black Stud 2015; 46:44–61. doi: 10.1177/0021934714557034.

Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Online social networking and addiction: A review of the psychological literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2011; 8:3528–52. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8093528.

Griffiths MD. Facebook addiction: Concerns, criticism and recommendations - A response to Andreassen and colleagues. Psychol Rep 2012; 110:518–20. doi: 10.2466/01.07.18. PR0.110.2.518-520.

Griffiths MD, Kuss DJ, Demetrovics Z. Social networking addiction: An overview of preliminary findings. In: Rosenberg KM, Feder LC, Eds. Behavioral addictions: Criteria, evidence and treatment. 1st ed. New York, USA: Academic Press, 2014. Pp. 119–41.

Alabi OF. A survey of Facebook addiction level among selected Nigerian University undergraduates. New Media Mass Commun 2013; 10:70–80.

Andreassen CS, Torsheim T, Brunborg GS, Palleson S. Development of a Facebook addiction scale. Psychol Rep 2012; 110:501–17. doi: 10.2466/02.09.18.PR0.110.2.501-517.

Andreassen CS, Palleson S. Facebook addiction: A reply to Griffiths (2012). Psychol Rep 2013; 113:899–902. doi: 10.24 66/02.09.PR0.113x32z6.

Akter T. Social media addiction, resistance, and influence of awareness: Measurement of psychology students’ resistance to Facebook addiction. Mediterr J Soc Sci 2014; 5:456–64. doi: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n8p456.

Ozer I. Facebook® Addiction, intensive social networking site use, multitasking, and academic performance among university students in the United States, Europe, and Turkey: A multigroup structural equation modeling approach. Dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College of Education, Health, & Human Services. From: etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_ file?accession=kent1403276756&disposition=inline Accessed: Feb 2015.

Volpi B, Tambelli R, Baiocco R, Marconi P. EPA-1276: Internet use and abuse - Attachment and new forms of psychopathology. Eur Psychiatry 2014; 29:1. doi: 10.1016/S0924-9338(14)78507-4.

Gnisci A, Perugini M, Pedone R, Di Conza A. Construct validation of the use, abuse and dependence on the Internet inventory. Comput Human Behav 2011; 27:240–7. doi: 10.10 16/j.chb.2010.08.002.

Wilson K, Fornasier S, White KM. Psychological predictors of young adults’ use of social networking sites. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2010; 13:173–7. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0094.

Collins E, Freeman J, Chamarro-Premuzic T. Personality traits associated with problematic and non-problematic massively multiplayer online role playing game use. Pers Individ Diff 2012; 52:133–8. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.015.

Cao F, Su L. Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: Prevalence and psychological features. Child Care Health Dev 2007; 33:275–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00715.x.

Cole SH, Hooley JM. Clinical and personality correlates of MMO gaming: Anxiety and absorption in problematic internet use. Soc Sci Comput Rev 2013; 31:424–36. doi: 10.11 77/0894439312475280.

Huh S, Bowman N. Perception of and addiction to online games as a function of personality traits. J Media Psychol 2008; 13:1–31.

Mehroof M, Griffiths MD. Online gaming addiction: The role of sensation seeking, self-control, neuroticism, aggression, state anxiety, and trait anxiety. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2010; 13:313–16. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0229.

Nerguz BS. An examination of predictor variables for problematic Internet use. Turk Online J Educ Technol 2011; 10:54–62.

Mehdizadeh S. Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and selfesteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2010; 13:357–64. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0257.

Cheston CC, Flickinger TE, Chisolm MS. Social media use in medical education: A systematic review. Acad Med 2013; 88:893–901. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828ffc23.

Seaman J, Tinti-Kane H. Social media for teaching and learning. From: www.meducationalliance.org/sites/default/files/social_ media_for_teaching_and_learning.pdf Accessed: Feb 2015.

Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 1948; 32:221–33.

Masters K. For what purpose and reasons do doctors use the Internet: A systematic review. Int J Med Inform 2008; 77:4–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.10.002.

Masters K. Access to and use of the Internet by South African general practitioners. Int J Med Inform 2008; 77:778–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.05.008.

Masters K. Health professionals as mobile content creators: Teaching medical students to develop mHealth applications. Med Teach 2014; 36:883–9. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.916783.

Campbell BC, Craig CM. Health professions students academic and personal motivations for using social media. From: www. communicationandhealth.ro/upload/number3/BRITANNYCAMPBELL-CLAY-CRAIG.pdf Accessed: Feb 2015.

Hollinderbäumer A, Hartz T, Uckert F. Education 2.0: How has social media and Web 2.0 been integrated into medical education? A systematical literature review. GMS Z Med Ausbild 2012; 30:14. doi: 10.3205/zma000857.

Masters K, Al-Rawahi Z. The use of mobile learning by 6th-year medical students in a minimally-supported environment. Int J Med Educ 2012; 3:92–7. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4fa6.f8e8.

Barrick MR, Mount MK, Judge TA. Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? Int J Select Assess 2001; 9:9–30. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00160.

Hurtz GM, Donovan JJ. Personality and job performance: The big five revisited. J Appl Psychol 2000; 85:869–79. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.869.

BBC News. Mainstream media ‘still dominate online news’. From: www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-27772070 Accessed: Feb 2015.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18295/squmj.2015.15.03.009

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.